Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Chelan County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 2010No. 81855-0PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtC. Johnson, J.

¶1 This case involves a challenge to a conditional use permit issued by a hearing examiner for a *869development on the shoreline of Lake Chelan. On review, the superior court reversed the examiner and denied the permit. The Court of Appeals dismissed the developers’ appeal as moot because (1) the permit required the developers complete conditions within two years, (2) two years had elapsed, and (3) the developers did not seek a stay on the superior court’s decision or the permit’s time limit. We conclude the developers, under these circumstances, were not required to seek a stay to preserve…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pinecrest Homeowners Ass'n v. Glen A. Cloninger & AssociatesWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Pinecrest Homeowners Ass'n v. GLEN A. CLONINGER & ASS'NWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Gold v. KaminAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  4. Kelly v. COUNTY OF CHELANWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Kelly v. Chelan CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Chelan CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  2. Kelly v. COUNTY OF CHELANCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API