Legal Opinion

Reilley v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1860PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from the Decatur Circuit Court.

1Per curiam

This was an indictment for receiving stolen goods. The defendant was convicted.

The only error assigned is, that the Court permitted the confessions of the thief, as to the fact of the larceny, to be given in evidence on the trial of this indictment against the receiver. The thief had not been tried at the time of the trial of the receiver.

Our statute creates the offense of receiving stolen goods, and provides that the receiver may be tried before the thief. 2 R. S. p. 409. When, therefore, it happens that the receiver is thus tried, it devolves upon the state to prove on his trial—

1. The…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dye v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Stone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. Miller v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Marjason v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1947
  5. State v. HannaOregon Supreme Court · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API