Legal Opinion

Loden v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 2017No. 2016-DR-00962-SCTPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EN BANC ORDER

MICHAEL K. RANDOLPH,

PRESIDING JUSTICE FOR THE COURT

Before the Court, en banc, is Thomas Loden’s Successive Petition for Post-Conviction Relief, the State’s Response, and Loden’s Reply. Restated, Lo-den’s issue was whether the State’s use of midazolam as part of the three-drug, lethal-injection protocol violates Mississippi Code Section 99-19-51 (Supp. 2016) because it is not an “ultra-short acting barbiturate or other similar drug.” However, the Legislature has since amended Section 99-19-51. See 2017 Miss. Laws H.B. 638. The statute now requires an “appropriate anesthetic or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tallahatchie General Hospital v. HoweMississippi Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Hughes v. HosemannMississippi Supreme Court · 2011

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jordan v. FisherDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2022
  2. Monica A. Teel v. Boyd Biloxi, LLC d/b/a IP Casino Resort & SpaCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2025
  3. Thomas Edwin Loden, Jr. v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Thomas Edwin Loden, Jr. v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API