Legal Opinion

Thomas Edwin Loden, Jr. v. State of Mississippi

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 2018No. 2017-DR-00870-SCTPublished

1Opinion of the Court

RANDOLPH, PRESIDING JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT:

¶ 1. Before the Court is Thomas Edwin Loden Jr.'s fourth 1 petition for post-conviction relief. Loden challenges the Mississippi Department of Corrections' use of midazolam in its lethal-injection protocol. He claims that midazolam is not an "appropriate anesthetic or sedative" that, "if properly administered in a sufficient quantity, is likely to render the condemned inmate unconscious, so that the execution process should not entail a substantial risk of severe pain" under Mississippi Code Section 99-19-51 (Supp. 2018). Loden requests this Court to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Baze v. ReesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Glossip v. GrossSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  3. Young v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Fears v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  5. Brown v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API