Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. Robertson
Nebraska Supreme Court
Appeal from the district court for Lancaster county: Albert J. Cornish, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.
The action is replevin and the property in controversy is a sewing-machine alleged to be of the value of $40. Plaintiff did not get the property under the writ, but to recover its value prosecuted the suit to final judgment. The trial resulted in a verdict for defendant, .and from an order of dismissal plaintiff has appealed.
Several rulings in giving or refusing instructions and in admitting or excluding testimony are challenged by plaintiff as erroneous, but defendant argues they should all be disregarded for the reason it is conclusively shown by uncontradicted testimony properly admitted…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Andrews v. HoeslichWashington Supreme Court · 1907
- Sexton v. McDowdMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- McBrian v. MorrisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Depriest v. McKinstryNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
- Heidiman-Benoist Saddlery Co. v. SchottNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Frank v. StearnsNebraska Supreme Court · 1923