Legal Opinion
E. Frederics, Inc. v. Eugene, Ltd.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 8, 1924Published
1Opinion of the Court
WINSLOW, District Judge.
These actions, tried together, are brought for injunctions and accountings against the above-named defendants upon two patents issued to E. O. Frederics, formerly E. O. Speckerman, which patents have been duly assigned to the plaintiff. In the first suit against Eugene, Limited, and in the suit against defendant Vickery, there is involved the patent No. 1,313,232. In the second suit against the defendant Eugene, Limited, is involved the consideration of patent No. 1,425,956. The second suit above against Eugene, Limited, and the suit against the defendant Vickery…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Nestle Patent Holding Co. v. E. Frederics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
- Nestle Patent Holding Co. v. E. Frederics, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1918