Legal Opinion
State v. Ocasio
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 13, 1998No. AC 16474PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HENNESSY, J.
The defendant, Angel Ocasio, appeals from the judgment of conviction of conspiracy to sell narcotics in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-48 and 2 la-277 (a) and violating the Corrupt Organizations and Racketeering Activity Act in violation of General Statutes § 53-395 (c). The defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) accepted his guilty plea without ensuring that it was not the result of force or threats or promises apart from the plea agreement and (2) denied his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. We reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The following…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Rowe v. GodouSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- State v. BadgettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. GrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- State v. AyalaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. NelsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- State v. OcasioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Meadowbrook Center, Inc. v. BuchmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- State v. OcasioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998