Legal Opinion

Olivarez v. Unitrin Property & Casualty Insurance

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided August 30, 2006No. 2005AP2471PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.

¶ 1. The law firm of Cannon & Dunphy, S.C., appeals from an order denying as untimely its motion to intervene to enforce its attorney's lien in a negligence action that had settled. Were the question one of law, or were we ruling in the first instance rather than as an appellate body, we likely would rule for Cannon & Dunphy. But given the deference we must accord the trial court's discretionary call, we are constrained to affirm the trial court's ruling. Our reluctance is tempered, however, because even were we to conclude that the court's timeliness determination was erroneous, we would…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hartung v. HartungWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Butler, Fitzgerald & Potter v. Sequa Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  3. Hedtcke v. Sentry InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Keith v. DaleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  5. State Ex Rel. Bilder v. Township of DelavanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Roy v. St. Lukes Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007
  2. Casper v. American International South InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009
  3. Dumas v. KoebelCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2013
  4. State v. FreerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009
  5. Casper v. American International South InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API