United States v. Santiago
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Circuit Judge.
In United States v. Leyba, 379 F.3d 53 (2d Cir.2004), we held that when counsel representing a non-English speaker files a motion to withdraw as counsel on appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), he must take reasonable action to ensure that his client received notice of the motion in a language the client understands. United States v. Leyba 379 F.3d at 55-56. Today we address a case in which counsel represents a defendant who may be illiterate.
Defendant-appellant Luis Santiago (“defendant” or “Santiago”)…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Ellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. Jacques ArrousCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Ruben LeybaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
3Cited by5 opinions
- Richard Ware Levitt, Esq. v. David H. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- (SS) O'Neal v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- Anita Hull v. Nancy A. BerryhillDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2019
- Mirto v. KijakaziDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
- Ray v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020