Legal Opinion
People v. Madori
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 5, 1990PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Balletta, J.
Pursuant to CPL 700.50 (3): ”[W]ithin a reasonable time, but in no case later than ninety days after termination of an eavesdropping warrant * * * written notice of the fact and date of the issuance of the eavesdropping warrant, and of the period of authorized eavesdropping, and of the fact that during such period communications were or were not intercepted, must be served upon the person named in the warrant”. The primary issue presented on this appeal is whether the notice provision of the statute is satisfied when, within the 90-day period, the prosecution…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Osborn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. St. LouisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. CapolongoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. GrossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
- People v. HickeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992