Legal Opinion

Burhaan Saleh v. Volvo Car USA, LLC

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided June 22, 2026No. 2:25-cv-13300Unknown

1Opinion

Not for Publication UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY BURHAAN SALEH, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 25-13300 (ES) (MAH) v. OPINION VOLVO CAR USA, LLC, Defendant. SALAS, DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is Volvo Car USA, LLC’s (“Volvo” or “Defendant”) motion to dismiss, (D.E. No. 11 (“Mot.”); D.E. No. 11-1 (“Mov. Br.”)), Burhaan Saleh’s (“Plaintiff”) complaint, (D.E. No. 1 (“Compl.”)). The Court resolves Defendant’s motion without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); L. Civ. R. 78.1(b). For the reasons set forth below, that motion is GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s Complaint is…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API