Legal Opinion

In Re Kiklis

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided September 26, 2006No. 19-40089PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION ON OBJECTION TO DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

WILLIAM C. HILLMAN, Bankruptcy Judge.

I. Introduction

The matter before the Court is the Disclosure Statement (“Disclosure Statement”) of the debtor Dana Louis Kiklis (“Debtor”). LEM Realty Co., Inc. (“LEM”) filed an objection on the grounds that the Disclosure Statement fails to adequately describe and address LEM’s un-dersecured claim. For the reasons set forth below, I will enter an order sustaining the objection.

II. Background

The operative facts related to this issue are not in dispute. When the Debtor filed his petition under Chapter 11 on May…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Sandy Ridge Development Corporation, Debtor. Sandy Ridge Development Corporation v. Louisiana National BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  2. Pratt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp. (In Re Pratt)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  3. In Re Robert Ray Harrison and Frankey Daylene Harrison, Debtors. Agricredit Corporation v. Robert Ray Harrison and Frankey Daylene HarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  4. Gens v. Resolution Trust Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  5. Fleet National Bank v. GrayCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re CORMIERUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API