Legal Opinion

Butters v. Kane

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 25, 1975PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POMEROY, Justice.

The entry of judgment n.o.v. (Rule 50(b), M.R.Civ.P.), in favor of a third-party defendant and against a defendant-third-party plaintiff has occasioned this appeal.

We deny the appeal.

The factual framework in which this litigation arose is as follows:

In 1970 two snowmobiles collided. One was operated by appellant Peter Kane; the other by appellee Robert Butters.

Beverly Butters, appellee’s wife, was a passenger in the snowmobile operated by appellee Butters. She received personal injuries in the accident.

A complaint alleging that her injuries resulted from the negligent conduct…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mensing v. SturgeonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
  2. Kelleher v. LozziSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  3. Lugena v. HannaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  4. Wm. H. Heinemann Creameries, Inc. v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Norton v. BenjaminSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Carriers Insurance Co. v. American Policyholders' InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  2. Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  3. Brown v. ManchesterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  4. Connell v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  5. Sexton v. First National Mercantile Bank & Trust Co. of JoplinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API