Butters v. Kane
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
POMEROY, Justice.
The entry of judgment n.o.v. (Rule 50(b), M.R.Civ.P.), in favor of a third-party defendant and against a defendant-third-party plaintiff has occasioned this appeal.
We deny the appeal.
The factual framework in which this litigation arose is as follows:
In 1970 two snowmobiles collided. One was operated by appellant Peter Kane; the other by appellee Robert Butters.
Beverly Butters, appellee’s wife, was a passenger in the snowmobile operated by appellee Butters. She received personal injuries in the accident.
A complaint alleging that her injuries resulted from the negligent conduct…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mensing v. SturgeonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
- Kelleher v. LozziSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Lugena v. HannaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
- Wm. H. Heinemann Creameries, Inc. v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Norton v. BenjaminSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Carriers Insurance Co. v. American Policyholders' InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
- Brown v. ManchesterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- Connell v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Sexton v. First National Mercantile Bank & Trust Co. of JoplinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.