Norcross v. Pickrell Drilling Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Fromme, J.:
Leo Norcross, claimant, appeals from an award by the district court under the workmen s compensation act. The principal question is whether the district court had the authority to amend a previous judgment and award.
A brief recital of the facts will present the issues. The claimant was injured on November 9, 1963, while employed by Pickrell Drilling Company, respondent, as an oilfield roughneck. The claimant was struck on the forehead while attempting to crank an engine and received a cut which required several stitches to close. He was not…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tafarella v. HandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
- Gray v. Hercules Powder Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1946
- Bushman Construction Co. v. SchumacherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
- Magers v. Martin Marietta CorporationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
- Fisher v. Rhoades Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wallace v. WallaceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- Isaacson Structural Steel Co. v. Armco Steel Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1982
- Boyd v. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- Waln v. Clarkson Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1993
- Dunn v. Kuhlman Diecasting Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.