Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Smith

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 28, 1959No. Crim. 6785PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

Defendant Williams was charged by information in Count I with bookmaking, in Count II with unlawfully keeping a place for recording bets, and in Count III with having recorded or registered bets (Pen. Code, § 337a, subds. 1, 2 and 4). His codefendant Smith was charged in Count I with bookmaking and in Count IV with permitting rooms to be used for bookmaking or for receiving and recording bets (Pen. Code, § 337a, subd. 5). Following a court trial, Williams was found guilty as charged in Count III and not guilty of the offenses charged in the remaining counts. Smith was acquitted. Williams has…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. People v. HinkleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  4. People v. NewmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. People v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. EmoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. People v. CobbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. People v. DemeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. People v. SilversCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Agnew v. LarsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API