State Ex Rel. Highway Department v. Snyder
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BAKER, Judge.
The question presented in this case is whether a finding of comparative fault against a plaintiff with respect to one tort-feasor, is legally inconsistent with a finding of no contributory negligence by that plaintiff with respect to the State as the other tortfeasor. We hold that such verdicts are legally inconsistent and, thus, reverse and remand for a new trial.
FACTS
On November 9, 1985, Dan Snyder was injured in an accident involving a car in which he was a passenger and which defendant Toby Parker was driving. The accident occurred when Parker swerved and drove the car off…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rust v. GuinnIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Spears v. AylorIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
- Smith v. DiamondIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Consolidated Rail Corp. v. ThomasIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Meeker v. RobinsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Highway Department v. SnyderIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Byrd v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- State Ex Rel. Highway Department v. SnyderIndiana Supreme Court · 1992