John J. McCarthy v. Mr. Maddigan, Dr. Perry Dr. Walter Dr. Delmuro
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Mr. McCarthy, a federal prisoner, filed a Bivens 1 — type civil action seeking monetary damages for the alleged deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. The district court, relying upon Brice v. Day, 604 F.2d 664, 666-68 (10th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1086, 100 S.Ct. 1045, 62 L.Ed.2d 772 (1980), dismissed the claim without prejudice as Mr. McCarthy failed to demonstrate he had made use of the administrative review process provided by the Bureau of Prisons. We affirmed, being bound by our precedent in Brice. See McCarthy v. Maddigan, 914 F.2d 1411 (10th Cir.1990).
The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- McCarthy v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Brice v. DayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
- John J. McCarthy v. Mr. Maddigan, Dr. Perry Dr. Walter, Dr. DelmuroCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ute Indian Tribe v. State of UtahDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1996