Legal Opinion

John J. McCarthy v. Mr. Maddigan, Dr. Perry Dr. Walter Dr. Delmuro

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 22, 1992No. 90-3112PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Mr. McCarthy, a federal prisoner, filed a Bivens 1 — type civil action seeking monetary damages for the alleged deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. The district court, relying upon Brice v. Day, 604 F.2d 664, 666-68 (10th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1086, 100 S.Ct. 1045, 62 L.Ed.2d 772 (1980), dismissed the claim without prejudice as Mr. McCarthy failed to demonstrate he had made use of the administrative review process provided by the Bureau of Prisons. We affirmed, being bound by our precedent in Brice. See McCarthy v. Maddigan, 914 F.2d 1411 (10th Cir.1990).

The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. McCarthy v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Brice v. DayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
  4. John J. McCarthy v. Mr. Maddigan, Dr. Perry Dr. Walter, Dr. DelmuroCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ute Indian Tribe v. State of UtahDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API