Legal Opinion
Hutchins v. HP Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 17, 2024No. 5:23-cv-05875Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 PAUL HUTCHINS, Case No. 23-cv-05875-BLF 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 9 v. DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND 10 HP INC., et al., [Re: ECF No. 25] 11 Defendants. 12 13 This purported class action presents a novel question: Whether and under what 14 circumstances is a plan administrator’s decision to use “forfeited” employer contributions to a 15 retirement plan to reduce employer contributions rather than to pay administrative costs a violation 16 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.