Legal Opinion

Coggeshall v. Massachusetts Board of Registration of Psychologists

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided May 17, 2010No. 09-1111PublishedCited by 106 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SELYA, Circuit Judge.

This appeal compels us to weave a decisional tapestry from several doctrinal strands that help define the margins of federal-court jurisdiction, including Eleventh Amendment immunity, abstention, and standing. The appellants (a psychologist and a third party) challenge a state administrative proceeding that resulted in the imposition of professional discipline against the psychologist. The district court determined that it could not grant relief on any of the myriad claims presented and, accordingly, dismissed the action. After careful consideration, we affirm.

I.…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by106 opinions

  1. Culhane v. Aurora Loan Services of NebrasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
  2. Mikhail v. KahnDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Goldstein v. GalvinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
  4. Román-Oliveras v. Puerto Rico Electric Power AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  5. Klimowicz v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018

101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API