Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Krogman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 2, 2003Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance *719Appeal Board, filed November 1, 2001, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant voluntarily left her employment with a temporary employment agency without good cause. Although claimant’s former position as a branch manager had been eliminated while she was on maternity leave, upon her return she declined to accept employment…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of CzamaraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. In re the Claim of EzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API