Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Yeoman

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 15, 1996No. Docket 165345PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, P.J.

Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of inserting an instrument into a money changer with the intent to steal, MCL 752.811(a); MSA 28.643(101)(a), and being an habitual offender with three previous felonies. MCL 769.12; MSA 28.1084. Defendant was sentenced to four to fifteen years in prison. We affirm defendant’s conviction, but remand for the purely administrative function of the preparation of a sentencing information report (sir).

After midnight on September 15, 1992, police officer Robert Anderson observed Doug Lawrence using a money changer at a car wash. When Officer Anderson…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. People v. MilbournMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  5. People v. StanawayMichigan Supreme Court · 1994

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. AbrahamMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. People v. BarbarichMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. People v. LoCiceroMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
  4. People v. EdgettMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. People v. JonesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API