Remy v. Municipality No. Two
Supreme Court of Louisiana
APPEAL from the Fifth District Court of New Orleans, Augustin, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Legardeur:
Presriplion never accrued in favor of the city, and, therefore, cannot be made tho basis of a title against us.
The immediate, nay the sole title set up by defendants is the Act of September 20th, 1820, under which the city claims on two distinct and very dissimilar grounds: first, by prescription of ten, twenty and thirty years, and, secondly, failing in this, by assuming that the Act dedicated the batture in controversy to public use. The latter ground has already boon examined at length. Our object is now to show that no prescription has acquired under this Act, and that, from its…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Wafer v. PrattSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1841
3Cited by11 opinions
- Blythe v. AyresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Holloway v. McCormickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Pueblo v. DimasSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1912
- Thomas v. Estate of ThomasNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
- Leathem & Smith Lumber Co. v. NaltySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.