Legal Opinion

Clinton Police Department Bargaining Unit v. City of Clinton

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 23, 1991No. 89-1437PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDREASEN, Justice.

This case involves an ordinance of the city of Clinton which requires police officers, fire fighters, and certain other essential employees to live within ten miles of the place where they report to work. Ann Meier Bormann (Bormann), a police officer, and the Clinton Police Department Bargaining Unit (the bargaining unit), challenged the ordinance on both statutory and constitutional grounds. The district court denied their challenge of the ordinance. We affirm.

I. Background.

In 1981, the city of Clinton adopted ordinance chapter 1685 section (3)(A) which provides:

All new…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. Philadelphia Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Detroit Police Officers Ass'n v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  3. J. D. Wright v. The City of Jackson, MississippiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  4. Bennett v. City of RedfieldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
  5. Frank Andre v. Board of Trustees of the Village of MaywoodCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Teamsters Local Union No. 421 v. City of DubuqueSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  2. Civil Service Commission v. Iowa Civil Rights CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  3. Seabrook Police Ass'n v. Town of SeabrookSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API