Preisendorf v. Mettenbrink
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFahrnbruch, J.
Gale and LaDonna Mettenbrink, husband and wife, appeal a decision of the Hall County District Court after a bench trial that they owe $13,500 for the extension of an option to buy farmland owned by John Preisendorf, Jr. We affirm with directions.
In an action at law tried to the court, the trial court’s factual findings have the effect of a jury verdict and will not be disturbed on appeal unless clearly wrong. In reviewing the trial court’s judgment in an action at law tried to the court, the Supreme Court does not reweigh the evidence but, instead, considers the judgment in the light most…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Smith v. WreheNebraska Supreme Court · 1978
- Stiles v. Skylark Meats, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1989
- Fredericks v. Western Livestock Auction Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1987
- Blanchard v. WhiteNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Donohoe v. American Isuzu Motors, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- FARM BUR. INS. CO. OF NEB. v. BierschenkNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
- Russell v. LuevanoNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
- Hughes v. Cornhusker Casualty Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1990
- NI Industries, Inc. v. Husker-Hawkeye Distributing, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1989