Legal Opinion
Kulp v. Timmons
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided July 30, 2002No. C.A. 1946-SPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JACOBS, Vice Chancellor.
Pending are cross motions for summary judgment in this action brought by the petitioner, Norman Kulp (“Kulp”), in aid of execution upon a judgment entered in Kulp’s favor in a workers’ compensation action. The respondent, Franklin Tim-mons, Sr. (“Timmons”), defends on the ground that he has no assets that can respond to the judgment because he previously conveyed all of his property to a spendthrift trust of which he (Timmons) is presently the settlor, trustee and (during his lifetime) the sole beneficiary. In this action, Kulp seeks to have the spendthrift…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Tracey v. FranklinSupreme Court of Delaware · 1949
- United States v. WestDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1969
- Gotham Partners, L.P. v. Hallwood Realty Partners, L.P.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1998
- Makin v. MacKCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1975
- Richards v. JonesCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1928
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Welch v. CrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- Multimedia Patent Trust v. Microsoft Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2007
- Protech Minerals, Inc. v. Dugout Team, LLCSupreme Court of Delaware · 2022
- Shareholder Representative Services LLC v. DC Capital Partners Fund II, L.P.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2022