Legal Opinion

Danciger v. American Express Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 4, 1915PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court. — Eon. Win. 0. Thomas, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

TRIMBLE, J.- —

'Plaintiffs, as partners, were engaged in the mail-order liquor business in the city of Dallas, Texas, under the name of the Harvest King Distilling Company. Their method of business was that, upon receipt through .the mail of orders from individuals throughout the State of Texas, plaintiffs would ship the liquor C. O. D., which means, of course, that the purchase price of the liquor should be collected by the carrier from the consignee upon delivery.

Influenced by certain legislation of the State of Texas, enacted for the purpose of regulating and restricting the shipment of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stone v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Corporation of Brick Presbyterian Church v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1826
  3. State v. Parker Distilling Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  4. Cordes v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Danciger v. WellsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Madore v. New Departure Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  2. Perseverance Common School District No. 90 v. HoneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963
  3. Shannon v. HinesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API