Legal Opinion
United States v. Lenardo
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided September 8, 1976No. Crim. A. 74-323PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COOLAHAN, Senior District Judge.
This case comes before the Court on remand from the Third Circuit Court of Appeals for a determination of (1) the applicability of United States v. Hale, 422 U.S. 171, 95 S.Ct. 2133, 45 L.Ed.2d 99 (1975), to a case pending on direct appeal at the time Hale was decided, and (2) whether Hale requires a new trial under the circumstances of this case. After the remand, the United States Supreme Court decided Doyle v. Ohio, 426 U.S. 610, 96 S.Ct. 2240, 49 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976), which determined the constitutional issue left open in Hale. Because of the relevance…
2Cases cited96 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- William M. Hallowell v. Paul W. Keve, Director of the Division of Adult Corrections and the State of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- United States of America Ex Rel. Melvin Lee Smith v. Charles J. Rowe and William KlusakCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- United States v. LenardoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- William M. Hallowell v. Paul W. Keve, Director of the Division of Adult Corrections and the State of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977