Wilson v. Tolson
Supreme Court of Georgia
Promissory Notes. Endorsement. Consideration. Before J udge Van Epps. City Court of Atlanta. September Term, 1886. Reported in the decision.
1Opinion of the Court
Blandford, Justice.
This was an action upon a promissory note, brought by Tolson, endorsee. The note was payable to a man named R. O. Randall. Randall endorsed the note “ for collection” for his account, to Tolson. Tolson brought an action in his own name on this note. A motion was made to dismiss, because it appeared on the face of the note that Tolson had no interest in it, and no legal title, and consequently could not maintain an action on it. The court refused to dismiss the action, and this is the first exception upon which error is assigned.
1. We think that in this the court was right;…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Gauldin v. SheheeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1856
3Cited by8 opinions
- Neal v. CraySupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Freeman v. Exchange BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- Smith v. BayerOregon Supreme Court · 1905
- Meadowcraft v. WalshMontana Supreme Court · 1895
- Wood v. Keysville Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.