Legal Opinion

Rafeedie v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 28, 1992No. Civ. A. 88-0366 (JHG)PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOYCE HENS GREEN, District Judge.

Every Judge who has examined this case agrees that “the government’s basic position” is “profoundly troubling.” 1 Plaintiff Fouad Yacoub Rafeedie (“Rafeedie”), a permanent resident alien who has resided in the United States since 1975, challenges the decision of the Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) to conduct summary exclusion proceedings against him under Section 235(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the “Act”), 8 U.S.C. § 1225(c). 2 The INS has invoked the summary procedure on the basis of confidential information,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re United Mine Workers of America Employee Benefit Plans LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1994
  2. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  3. Greenhouse v. GerenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  4. RUIZ-MASSIEUBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1999
  5. In Re Polar Bear Endangered Species Act ListingDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API