Legal Opinion
Matter of Stallone v. Breweries
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 16, 1961PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed upon the memorandum in the Appellate Division, with costs to respondent Workmen’s Compensation Board. No opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Burke and Foster. Judges Fuld, Froessel and Van Voorhis dissent and vote to reverse and to remit the matter to the Workmen’s Compensation Board in the following memorandum: The result achieved by this affirmance is so unreasonable, the amount of compensation allowed so out of line with earnings received, that we cannot believe that the Legislature ever intended such a construction as has here been given of subdivision 3 of…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Claim of Reasoner v. New York State Department of Motor VehiclesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Pease v. Anchor Motor FreightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Claim of Gurewicz v. 107 N. Fifth St. Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Claim of Pfeffer v. Parkside Caterers, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Miranda v. National Medical Care, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.