Glavin v. Salmon River Canal Co., Ltd.
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BRINCK, Commissioner.
Plaintiff is the owner of land in the Salmon Carey Act Segregation, the defendant being the operating company for the project, which at the time this suit was commenced embraced some 35,000 acres of land, in connection with which project water rights existed. Plaintiff owns a water right for his land purchased from the Carey Act construction company, and is by virtue thereof a stockholder in the defendant corporation.
The duty of water on this project is fixed, according to a stipulation in the record, at two and one-third acre-feet per acre, and the water for the project,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hutchinson v. Watson Slough Ditch Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1909
- Coulson v. Aberdeen-Springfield Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1924
- State v. Twin Falls Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1911
- Gunnison Irr. Co. v. Gunnison Highland Canal Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1918
3Cited by12 opinions
- American Falls Reservoir District No. 2 v. Idaho Department of Water ResourcesIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. Hagerman Water Right Owners, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1997
- Burley Irr. Dist. v. IckesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Washington County Irrigation District v. TalboyIdaho Supreme Court · 1935
- Briggs v. GOLDEN VALLEY LAND & CATTLE COMPANYIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.