Marcum v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Morris, Commissioner—
Affirming.
On the former appeal of this case we reversed for a new trial, because it was developed that one of the jurors on the first trial was disqualified. 283 Ky. 590, 142 S. W. (2d) 137. The first verdict visited a penalty of confinement of each appellant for a period of fifteen years, which upon retrial was reduced to five years; from a judgment in accordance appeal is prosecuted, it being contended that the court erred in the admission of incompetent and prejudicial evidence; refused to admit competent evidence offered by appellants, which as…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Eaton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
- Cox v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Marcum v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
- Gross v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
3Cited by2 opinions
- Higginbotham v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
- Bowling v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1955