Legal Opinion

Marcum v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided January 30, 1942PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Morris, Commissioner—

Affirming.

On the former appeal of this case we reversed for a new trial, because it was developed that one of the jurors on the first trial was disqualified. 283 Ky. 590, 142 S. W. (2d) 137. The first verdict visited a penalty of confinement of each appellant for a period of fifteen years, which upon retrial was reduced to five years; from a judgment in accordance appeal is prosecuted, it being contended that the court erred in the admission of incompetent and prejudicial evidence; refused to admit competent evidence offered by appellants, which as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Eaton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  2. Cox v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  3. Marcum v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  4. Gross v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Higginbotham v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  2. Bowling v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API