Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Kaleikini v. Thielen

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 2010No. 28491Published

1Concurrence

Concurring Opinion by

ACOBA, J.

I believe that (1) this appeal is moot, but fell within the public interest exception to the mootness doctrine,1 (2) Petitioner had the right to a contested case hearing on a decision to remove the Native Hawaiian burial remains (iwi) in this case, and (3) the circuit court of the first circuit (the court) erred when it determined that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the administrative appeal. I respectfully disagree with the majority’s analysis in several aspects. First, I do not concur with the majority’s opinion that “a contested case hearing was…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. White v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Cunningham v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Osborn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Coon v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 2002

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API