Christensen v. People
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott
This direct appeal requires us to determine whether a petition for habeas corpus is an available remedy for an alleged failure of the parole board to grant a state inmate’s request for absolute release or parole. The district court dismissed the petition because the inmate did not allege that he was entitled to immediate release. We affirm.
I
On July 30, 1976, plaintiff-appellant James Earl Christensen was sentenced to an indeterminate term of “one day to life,” pursuant to section 16-13-203, C.R.S. (1973) (now section 16-13-203, 8A C.R.S. (1986)), of the Colorado Sex Offenders Act (hereafter…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Specht v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Thiret v. KautzkySupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Kodama v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Trueblood v. TinsleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
- Blevins v. TihonovichSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. OglethorpeColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
- Fields v. SuthersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
- Jones v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019
- Spoto v. Colorado State Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- People v. WorthamColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.