Legal Opinion

Christensen v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 28, 1994No. 93SA194PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

This direct appeal requires us to determine whether a petition for habeas corpus is an available remedy for an alleged failure of the parole board to grant a state inmate’s request for absolute release or parole. The district court dismissed the petition because the inmate did not allege that he was entitled to immediate release. We affirm.

I

On July 30, 1976, plaintiff-appellant James Earl Christensen was sentenced to an indeterminate term of “one day to life,” pursuant to section 16-13-203, C.R.S. (1973) (now section 16-13-203, 8A C.R.S. (1986)), of the Colorado Sex Offenders Act (hereafter…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Specht v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Thiret v. KautzkySupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  3. Kodama v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  4. Trueblood v. TinsleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  5. Blevins v. TihonovichSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. OglethorpeColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Fields v. SuthersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  3. Jones v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019
  4. Spoto v. Colorado State Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  5. People v. WorthamColorado Court of Appeals · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API