Disciplinary Board v. Kellington
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partCrothers, Justice
[¶ 36] This case is before the Court on a Petition to Revoke Probation and a Petition for Discipline. I agree disciplinary counsel met his burden of proving violations of Rules 1.5(a) and 5.3(a), but respectfully disagree with the sanction imposed as a result of the new violation. I agree Kellington’s stay of suspension should be revoked, but respectfully disagree on the length of suspension imposed.
[¶ 37] Disciplinary counsel alleged violation of Rule 1.5(a), N.D.R. Prof. Conduct, that Kellington charged excessive fees. Kellington admitted that time entries for transcription, faxing and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hilton v. North Dakota Education Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Dieterle v. DieterleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Dieterle v. DieterleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- In Re the Application for Disciplinary Action Against DvorakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. HannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.