Legal Opinion

Harrington v. Citizens' Investment & Security Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 8, 1923PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, J.,

(after stating the facts). It has been held by this court that the giving of a renewal note with the knowledge at the time of a failure of the consideration for the original note waives such defense, and the maker is thereby estopped from pleading such failure in an action on the renewal note. Stewart v. Simon, 111 Ark. 358, and Haglin v. Friedman, 118 Ark. 465.

It is true that the consideration for the original note failed because the note was given upon the condition that the capital stock of the Citizens’ Investment & Security Company should he increased from $25,000 to $100,000.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stewart v. SimonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  2. Haglin v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City National Bank of Fort Smith, Arkansas v. VanderboomDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1968
  2. Wright Et Ux v. Hage Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Calvin Watson Motor Sales v. DevaullAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
  4. Thomas v. Arkansas State Fair Assn.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  5. William M. Hogan v. Bank of Little RockCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API