Legal Opinion

Galloway v. Kuhl

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 2, 2004No. 5-03-0041PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hopkins

After a trial involving the Illinois Domestic Animals Running at Large Act (510 ILCS 55/1 et seq. (West 2000)), the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, Lloyd Galloway, and against the defendants, Raymond Kuhl, Kuhl Farms, Mike Kuhl, Fred Kuhl, John Kuhl, and Henry Kuhl, and reduced the plaintiff’s damages by 50% for the plaintiffs comparative negligence. Although the jury awarded the plaintiff damages for disfigurement and pain and suffering, it failed to award damages for the plaintiffs medical expenses. After the parties filed posttrial motions, the trial court determined…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Alvis v. RibarIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Coney v. J. L. G. Industries, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Simmons v. Union Electric Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Schultz v. Henry Ericsson Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Wottowa Insurance Agency, Inc. v. BockIllinois Supreme Court · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Redmond v. SochaIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Sheth v. SAB Tool Supply Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2013
  3. Poliszczuk v. WinklerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  4. Poliszczuk v. WinklerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  5. Redmond v. SochaIllinois Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API