Paradigm Learning, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SWEENEY, Judge.
Defendant moves to dismiss plaintiffs complaint for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). For the reasons set forth below, the court denies defendant’s motion.
I. BACKGROUND1
A. ZODIAK, the Game of Business Finance and Strategy
At the center of this case is a learning tool developed by plaintiff Paradigm Learning, Inc. titled “ZODIAK, the Game of Business Finance and Strategy” (“ZODIAK”). Compl. ¶ 10. ZODIAK participants, in a facilitated environment, simulate buying a business. Id. ¶ 12.…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Environmental Safety Consultants, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Bowers Investment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Demodulation, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Vero Technical Support, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Jones v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.