Legal Opinion

Diadenko v. Folino

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided August 20, 2012No. 10 C 2723PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOHN F. GRADY, District Judge.

Before the court is the motion for summary judgment of defendants Mary Ann *980Folino and The Board of Education for Chicago Public School District # 299 (the “Board”). For the reasons explained below, we grant the defendants’ motion.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs Elena Diadenko, Sally Chiodo, and Andrew Breen worked for Schurz High School (“Schurz”) during the time period relevant to this lawsuit. They allege that Folino, Schurz’s principal, improperly disciplined them for criticizing the way that Folino and her staff ran the school, and that the Board has a…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Garcetti v. CeballosSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Kidwell v. EisenhauerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  4. Anne Dey v. Colt Construction & Development CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  5. McGrath v. FaheyIllinois Supreme Court · 1988

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cunliffe v. WrightDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
  2. Slep-Tone Entertainment Corp. v. CoyneDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
  3. DEY v. INNODATA, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
  4. Mercer v. Favorite Healthcare Staffing, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
  5. Strzykalski v. Board of Education of Summit Hill School District 161District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API