George A. Ohl & Co. v. A. L. Smith Iron Works
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hughes
In these actions at law, tried together before District Judge James A. Lowell and' a jury, respondent obtained judgments and petitioner appealed to the Circuit Court of Appeals. The records on the appeals contained what purported to be bills of exceptions signed by the attorneys for the respective parties and initialed by the District Judge as follows: “Allowed August 20, 1930, J. A. L., D. J.” The Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the judgments upon the sole ground that the bills of exceptions were not sufficiently authenticated and that it was too late to send the cases back for amendment…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. MayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Nalle v. OysterSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Idaho & Oregon Land Improvement Co. v. BradburySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Mussina v. CavazosSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Malony v. AdsitSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Steffen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
- Jones v. Fox Film Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
- State ex rel. Rogers v. TaftOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Chervy v. PENINSULAR AND ORIENTAL STEAM NAVIGATION COMPANY, LTD.District Court, S.D. California · 1964
- Johnson v. Titanium Pigment Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.