Legal Opinion

State v. Barnes

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1989No. 88-119PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHastings, C.J.

Following a trial by jury, the defendant was found guilty of obtaining, by means of a willfully false statement, representation, or other device, a benefit administered by the Department of Social Services (DSS); i.e., a payment to which she was not entitled, or a larger payment than that to which she was entitled, in excess of $500. She was sentenced to probation for 5 years and ordered to pay restitution in the amount of $3,635.28.

On appeal, defendant assigns as error that the trial court improperly admitted statements made by the defendant after having overruled her motion to suppress.

In…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People v. ParadaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  3. State v. GibsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. TexelNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Doe v. ChangHawaii Supreme Court · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HankinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. JolitzNebraska Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API