Legal Opinion

Barquin v. Flores

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 20, 1984No. 84-995PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

459 So.2d 436 (1984)

Juan BARQUIN, Appellant,

v.

Orestes FLORES and Jose Flores, Appellees.

No. 84-995.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

November 20, 1984.

Joel Lumer, Jugo & Ferradaz, Miami, for appellant.

Harvey D. Friedman, Miami Beach, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.

BASKIN, Judge.

Florida courts have consistently held that gambling obligations, even if valid in the state in which they were undertaken, are unenforceable in Florida as contrary to law and public policy. See Dorado Beach Hotel Corp. v. Jernigan, 202 So.2d 830 (Fla. 1st DCA 1967), appeal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Young v. Sands, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  2. Dorado Beach Hotel Corporation v. JerniganDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. M & R INVESTMENTS, CO. INC. v. HackerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  2. Mirage-Casino Hotel v. Simpson (In Re Simpson)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2003
  3. CARNIVAL LEISURE INDUS. LTD. v. HermanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  4. Froug v. CARNIVAL LEISURE INDUS. LTD.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  5. Desert Palace, Inc. v. Hionas (In Re Hionas)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API