Legal Opinion
General Re Corp. v. Foxe
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 15, 1998PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Bernard J. Fried, J.
Petitioners,1 General Re Corporation and General Re Financial Products Corporation, have instituted this special proceeding to stay a demand of arbitration by two former employees, Thomas Timothy Foxe and David W. Rose, respondents. (CPLR 7503 [b].) Respondents have cross-moved to compel the requested arbitration. (CPLR 7503 [a].)
General Re Corporation (GRN), a Delaware corporation, with its principal place of business in Connecticut, is the parent company of General Re Financial Products Corporation (GRFP), also a Delaware corporation, with its…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Primex International Corp. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1997
- In re the Arbitration between Waldron & GoddessNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Smith Barney Shearson Inc. v. SacharowNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- BWA Corp. v. Alltrans Express U.S.A., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- In re the Arbitration between Doughboy Industries Inc. & Pantasote Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gerig v. KahnOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Gerig v. KahnOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Clarendon National Insurance v. LanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001