In Re Estate of Devroy
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1DissentSteinmetz, J.
I do not believe, as does the majority, that the safeguards written into this will sufficiently protect the concern for the appearance of propriety and against the fear of solicitation.
The statements in this will referring to the attorney’s unique ability in probating it and protecting the testator’s wishes are:(1) “This preferential designation of Todd J. Schmel-ing as the attorney to probate my estate is made as an expression of my intent and desire as to the manner in which I wish my affairs to be settled, and without any solicitation, suggestion or influence on the part of Todd J.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sieben v. PhillipsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- State v. GulbankianWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972