Legal Opinion

South Carolina Wildlife & Marine Resources Department v. Kunkle

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 28, 1985No. 22394PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gregory, Justice:

Respondent William Preston Kunkle brought this action challenging the suspension of his hunting and fishing privileges by the South Carolina Wildlife and Marine Resources Department. On appeal from a departmental hearing, the Circuit Court reversed the suspension. The Department now appeals. We reverse, and reinstate the suspension.

Kunkle was charged with taking game fish illegally [S. C. Code Ann. § 50-13-10 (1976)] and fishing illegal traps [S. C. Code Ann. § 50-13-1165 (1976)]. He was tried and convicted in his absence in Magistrate’s Court. Thereafter, the Department…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. South Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. BreelandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946
  2. DeWitt v. South Carolina Department of Highways & Public TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  3. Knight v. LeeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1974

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hubbs v. Government Employees InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  2. State v. LatimoreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
  3. State v. LatimoreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
  4. West v. Rock Hill School District ThreeDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2022
  5. West v. Rock Hill School District ThreeDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API