Legal Opinion
State v. Daugerdas, No. Cr 92-0204816 (Dec. 16, 1992)
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided December 16, 1992No. CR 92-0204816Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS In this action, the defendant is being prosecuted for offering to make home improvements without having a current certificate of registration from the commissioner of consumer protection as required by General Statutes 20-427 (b)(5). It is agreed that the defendant is a house painter and that the work he offered to perform was the painting of a house in Woodbury. The defendant contends that house-painting is not an activity encompassed in the definition of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Winters v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State v. PickeringSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Concerned Citizens of Sterling v. Town of SterlingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- United Illuminating Co. v. GroppoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.