Legal Opinion

Thury v. Britannia Acquisition Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 4, 2002Published

1Opinion of the Court

In an action, inter *374alia, for a judgment declaring that the plaintiffs have a prescriptive easement over the defendant’s property, the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Dunn, J.), dated November 8, 2000, which, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is modified by deleting so much of the first decretal paragraph thereof as dismissed the fourth cause of action and substituting therefor a provision declaring that the plaintiffs have a prescriptive easement across the property of the defendant, commencing at the northwest…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Di Leo v. Pecksto Holding Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Coup. v. BarthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Beutler v. MaynardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  4. Beutler v. MaynardNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Borruso v. MorrealeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API