Legal Opinion

Edens v. South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 19, 1983No. 21929Published

1DissentHarwell, Justice

The evidence in the case at bar was ample to submit to the jury the issue of whether the insured received the cancellation notice. In ruling on a motion for a directed verdict, the judge views all the evidence and reasonable inferences from the evidence in the light most favorable to the party resisting the motion. Jones v. Broome, 277 S. C. 295, 286 S. E. (2d) 664 (1982).

Respondent’s agents testified at trial that on August 13, *3811974 a cancellation notice and a refund check for the unearned premium were sent to appellant by its normal cancellation procedure. That procedure included…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moore v. Palmetto Bank & Textile InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  2. Jones v. BroomeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  3. Glenn v. Western Union Tel. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API