Legal Opinion

Moore v. Palmetto Bank & Textile Insurance

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 24, 1961No. 17786PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Moss, Justice.

Textile Insurance Company, the appellant herein, did, on December 24, 1958, issue and deliver its automobile collision policy, No. FA 1 55 80, to Vera O. Moore, the respondent herein, whose address according to the policy was 104 Cora Street, Laurens, South Carolina, with a mortgagee loss pay*343able clause in favor of the Palmetto Bank of Laurens, South Carolina. The respondent instituted this action to recover under the policy of insurance for damages sustained to her automobile in a collision on April 12, 1959.

The Palmetto Bank of Laurens, South Carolina, was made a party…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ampy v. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Virginia · 1958
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PedersonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1947
  3. Nat'l Bank of Honea Path v. Barrett Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
  4. Wolonter v. United States Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1919
  5. Dent v. Monarch Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Farmers Insurance Group v. MerryweatherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  2. Laxton v. National Grange Mutual Insurance Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Edens v. South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  4. Allied Concord Financial Corp. v. Sterling InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1968
  5. Nance v. Blue Ridge InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API