Legal Opinion

Eill v. Tegler

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 14, 1998PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, J.:

This is an appeal from an order granting appellee Chris Noordendorp’s motion for summary judgment. We affirm.

Appellant Donald P. Eill instituted this action in order to recover real estate brokerage commissions allegedly owed him. Appellant asserts in his complaint that he was to share a commission with Thomas D. Tegler and appellee Noordendorp. At the relevant time, appellant was employed by Tegler Real Estate Associates,. Inc. as a real estate salesperson. Tegler was the licensed broker for the real estate deal underlying this action. Appellee Noordendorp was not a licensed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Borden, Inc. v. Advent Ink Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Kreider v. KleinfelterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Wagner v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Adames, M. v. Tolomello, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  2. Eill v. TeglerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. In re Estate of Jodon, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Centre County2010
  4. Kelly v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Kelly v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API